LAWMAKER DISPUTES WITH COMMITTEE’S NNPCL DIRECTIVES

Read Time:1 Minute, 59 Second


Marie Ebikake, the House of Representatives member for Brass-Nembe Federal Constituency, has clarified that the media reports about the forensic audit of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) do not accurately reflect the committee’s stance.

She noted that the Special Joint Committee had instructed the NNPCL to suspend what it referred to as the “mortgaging” of Nigeria’s future crude oil until the investigation is complete.

The committee, led by Ikenga Ugochinyere from Ideato South/Ideato North Federal Constituency, began examining questionable practices in the sector last week.

Recall that the committee chaired by the lawmaker representing Ideato South/Ideato North Federal Constituency, Imo State, Ikenga Ugochinyere, commenced its probe of shady deals in the sector last week.

The committee’s directive was prompted by reports that the NNPCL was seeking to borrow an extra $2 billion in crude oil-backed loans from international creditors to increase its financial resources. However, on Friday, Ebikake distanced herself from this directive issued to the national oil company.

The statement reads, “If the recent publication credited to some of our members, which outrightly contradicts the position of the Petroleum (Midstream & Downstream) Joint Committee, with respect to the current forensic investigation of the operations of the NNPCL is true, then I am at a loss to understand the significance of sections 88 and 89 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, with relation to our responsibility as representatives of the people.

“If indeed that press statement emanated from the purported group of 50 lawmakers, then it is a low blow that hurts none other than our honorable selves, simply because it publicly expresses a division on the crucial issue of national survival, and is an irreversible injury to our collective credibility as representatives of the citizens.

“In my opinion, even the parliamentary culture alluded to, by the group, should not be invoked for the protection of the interest of heads of parastatals, organizations and public agencies against the protection of the interest of the citizens which, I believe, is the hallowed responsibility of the people’s parliament.

“Consequently, I wish to express my total dissociation from the decision of the group of 50, in the considered opinion that the position held by the joint committee led by Ugochinyere truly represents the collective interest of our constituents, and the goodwill of the President.”

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %