NATASHA’S LAWYERS CLAIM SELECTIVE JUSTICE OVER UNRESOLVED PETITIONS

Read Time:1 Minute, 38 Second

By: Motunrayo Aniwura

The legal team representing Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has raised concerns over what it calls a troubling case of selective justice, following the Federal Government’s decision to file criminal charges against the senator, while ignoring several serious petitions she filed earlier in the year.

In a statement issued on Wednesday by her lawyer, Uju Nwoduwu, the team revealed that Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan submitted 12 separate petitions between March and May 2025.

These petitions reportedly include allegations of cyberstalking, defamation, threats to her life, and even an attempted assassination.

The legal team noted with alarm that, to date, none of these complaints have received attention or action from the Nigeria Police Force or any relevant security agency.

“There is a legitimate public expectation that law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies uphold the principles of fairness, due process, and equal justice—regardless of who is involved,” the statement said.

The lawyers further expressed concern that while Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petitions remain unattended, counter-allegations filed by those she accused including Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello have been swiftly pursued, leading to criminal charges against her.

“This glaring disparity raises serious concerns about a biased and uneven application of justice,” the statement continued.

Some of the petitions, they added, involve high-ranking officials and incidents as grave as the abduction and attempted assassination of a protocol officer.

Though currently abroad on personal engagements, Akpoti-Uduaghan has acknowledged receipt of official communication regarding the charges and has pledged to make herself available for arraignment as soon as a date is set.

“She remains resolute in her commitment to due process,” the legal team affirmed, while also thanking members of the public who have voiced concern over what they called “an extraordinarily questionable criminal charge.”

The statement concluded with a renewed appeal for impartial investigations into all outstanding petitions and a call for justice to be applied equally, without fear or favour.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %