UPDATE: S’COURT DISMISSES PDP APPLICATION SEEKING UZODIMMA’S REMOVAL
Read Time:2 Minute, 29 Second
The Supreme Court has dismissed an application by Emeka Ihedioha of the Peoples Democratic Party seeking to remove Hope Uzodinma from office as Imo state governor.
The applicant contended in the case that if the Supreme Court recognized Nwosu as the APC’s candidate, there was no legal foundation for its judgment dismissing Ihedioha and declaring Uzodinma, who was also sponsored by the APC, as the genuine winner of the governorship election.
In the application, the party also argued that the Supreme Court did not rule on the validity of Uzodinma’s candidacy since it was not challenged by Ihedioha and the PDP in the appeal marked SC/1462/2019.
However, the applicant asked the court to issue a consequential order, directing the Independent National Electoral Commission to issue a certificate of return to Ihedioha as the legitimately elected governor of Imo state in the 2019 election.
Before ruling on the matter on Tuesday, one of the justices on the panel, Justice Okoro, had while asking the counsel for the applicant, Mike Ozekhome, SAN if the court had jurisdiction to hear the matter, warned that frivolous cases would not be tolerated.
He said, “In the atmosphere we are in now, we will not entertain speculative matters. You must come to this court with a genuine matter. Counsel knows the truth before any matter is brought to court. Recently people bring in impossible matters to the judiciary then they go to social media to denigrate the court. You know we do not have jurisdiction. This is an election-related matter, you know the 60 days given to us by the constitution had elapsed.
But Ozekhome, citing a plethora of cases insisted that the court had jurisdiction to hear the matter.
He said, “This court has jurisdiction to determine this matter. We are urging the court to give effect to the judgment of this apex court in SC 1384/2019 delivered on Dec 20, 2019. This court should not uphold illegality. Nowsu was involved in double nominations.
“Four years after, the court determined that Chris Ngige was wrongly sworn in because of the Illegality involved in his emergence, it was taken that he was never sworn in. I urged the court to hear the case.”
Reading the lead judgement, Justice Tijjani Abubakar held that the application lacked merit, and was frivolous and vexatious.
He said the court lacked jurisdiction to determine the matter, adding that the 60 days stipulated to hear the election matter had since elapsed.
Abubakar, subsequently fined Counsel for the PDP, Mike Ozekhome, SAN, N40m for bringing the matter before the court.
He said, “The application is an election-related matter. Where do we find jurisdiction to hear this application?
“Our position is that we have no jurisdiction. This is a calculated attempt to relitigate the matter. The application is frivolous and vexatious. It is totally lacking in merit. Counsel for the applicant is hereby ordered to pay N40m to the listed parties in the matter.”
Happy
0 %
Sad
0 %
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
0 %
Surprise
0 %
0
0